Adults feed predominantly on bottom algae, some of the planktonic organisms that are found in their stomachs are probably those which have settled on the bottom or were washed shorewards from open waters but they do feed directly on plankton . A maternal mouthbrooder, males make complex courtship structures in the substrate . Was a major component of the fisheries catch in Lake Victoria . Some pond culture attempted . IUCN conservation status is critically endangered .
Dorsal spines (total): 16 - 18; Dorsal soft rays (total): 10 - 12; Anal spines: 3; Anal soft rays: 9 - 11; Vertebrae: 29 - 31. Diagnosis: Large bodied tilapiine cichlid; females and unripe males have a grey/green body and fins with 6-7 dark vertical bars on the flank; ripening males with yellowish chin, and notable bright red/orange margins to the dorsal and caudal fins; fully ripe males are black with a blue sheen on the head, bright red/orange margins to the dorsal and caudal fins and a long, branched whitish or yellow genital tassel . The breeding male of Oreochromis variabilis is distinguished from O. niloticus and O. esculentus by the intense orange to scarlet colour of the margin of the dorsal fin and the long, tasselled genital papilla, as well as by the general body colour; the orange dorsal margin is present also in grown females and non-breeding males, though narrower and less brilliant . Other distinguishing characters are: the tilapia-mark is absent in young longer than 15 mm standard length, whereas in O. esculentus it is conspicuous and with a clear ring up to about 70 mm standard length and may still be detected up to 170 mm; the profile usually has a convexity immediately before the eye; there are usually two rows of scales on the cheek in contrast to usually three in O. esculentus; in half-grown and full-grown fishes there are 4-7 series of teeth in the jaws, 3-5 in O. esculentus; the ratio depth of preorbital to length of head is more than 1/5 in O. variabilis, 1/5 or less in O. esculentus; longer gill-rakers; and whereas O. esculentus does not mount beyond the estuaries, O. variabilis enters rivers from the lake . Oreochromis variabilis differs from both O. malagarasi and O. upembae, its nearest relatives, in the suppression in most phases of blotches on the flanks, in the body colour of mature males, which is blue-grey to blue-black vs. yellowish in O. upembae, in the shape of the profile, which in O. malagarasi and O. upembae lacks the 'bump' before the eye, a lower modal number of soft dorsal and anal rays, and a higher modal number of vertebrae; Oreochromis upembae also differs from O. variabilis in having usually narrow vertical stripes on the caudal fin . : fusiform / normal; Cross section: compressed.
Behavioural data for Victoria tilapia is currently being reviewed.
Diet information for Victoria tilapia is currently being compiled.
Nests are built on sandy bottoms in shallow waters. Each nest consists of a central shallow saucer 13-15 cm in diameter, around which is a circle of small pits. This structure is the center of a larger pit, 30-39 cm in diameter. Breeding pair makes the T-stand. Female lays batches of eggs; picks them up and sucks at the male's genital tassel.
Freshwater; benthopelagic; depth range 4 - 49 m. Tropical; 23°C - 28°C
"Victoria tilapia is an edible species."
Detailed nutritional data for Victoria tilapia is currently being compiled from USDA FoodData Central.
Mercury data for Victoria tilapia has not yet been assigned. Please consult FDA/EPA guidance for general seafood safety advice.
| Language | Common Names |
|---|---|
| 🇬🇧English | Cichlid · Victoria Tilapia |
| 🇫🇮Finnish | hopeatilapia |
| Scientific Name | Author | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nyasalapia variabilis | Boulenger | 1906 | Synonym |
| Sarotherodon variabilis | Boulenger | 1906 | Synonym |
| Tilapia variabilis | Boulenger | 1906 | Synonym |
Occurrence records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) - 24 records indexed .
No observations yet - be the first to log one!
View all observations for Victoria tilapia ↗Spotted incorrect or outdated data? Submit a correction and our editorial team will review it. Approved edits go live within 48 hours.
Found a factual error, broken data, or inappropriate content? Let us know and we will investigate promptly.