Found in coastal waters and in rivers, presumably tolerating brackish water, if not fully fresh condition. More data needed.
Dorsal spines (total): 0; Anal spines: 0; Anal soft rays: 22 - 28. Body moderately deep; belly with 16 to 19 (usually 18) + 9 to 12 (usually 10 or 11) total 27 to 31 (usually 29 or 30) scutes; pre-dorsal scutes present, 17 to 26 (usually 20 to 25). gill rakers of first arch at least 3/4 length of gill filaments. Vertebrae 43 to 46 (usually 44 or 45). A dark spot behind gill opening, followed by further spots on flank.: fusiform / normal; Cross section: compressed.
Behavioural data for Chinese gizzard shad is currently being reviewed.
Marine; freshwater; brackish; pelagic-neritic; anadromous ; depth range 0 - 50 m . Tropical; 41°N - 6°N, 98°E - 128°E Northwest Pacific: China, apparently south to Viet Nam (Philippine records of Fowler appear doubtful).
"Chinese gizzard shad is an edible species."
Per 100g cooked - Source: USDA FoodData Central
| Nutrient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Protein | 19 g |
| Omega-3 (total) | 415 mg |
Mercury data for Chinese gizzard shad has not yet been assigned. Please consult FDA/EPA guidance for general seafood safety advice.
Per 100g - Raw, per 100g - Source: USDA FoodData Central templates (generic fish average)
| Year | Region | Index | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - |
| Scientific Name | Author | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chatoessus haihoensis | Oshima | 1926 | Synonym |
| Chatoessus maculatus | Richardson | 1846 | Synonym |
| Chatoessus osbeckii | Valenciennes | 1848 | Synonym |
| Chatoessus triza | Linnaeus | 1759 | Heterotypic |
| Clupanodon haihoensis | Oshima | 1926 | Synonym |
| Clupea thrissa | Linnaeus | 1758 | Synonym |
| Clupea triza | Linnaeus | 1759 | Synonym |
| Dorosoma thrissa | Linnaeus | 1758 | Synonym |
Occurrence records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) - 13 records indexed .
No observations yet - be the first to log one!
View all observations for Chinese gizzard shad ↗Spotted incorrect or outdated data? Submit a correction and our editorial team will review it. Approved edits go live within 48 hours.
Found a factual error, broken data, or inappropriate content? Let us know and we will investigate promptly.