New 🐟 2024 Mercury Safety Guide Now Available. Omega-3 Rankings Updated. View Omega-3 Rankings →

💧 Freshwater Data Deficient 🌡️ Tropical

Labeobarbus Wittei

Labeobarbus wittei Banister & Poll, 1973
Max Length
27.5 cm
Max Weight
Lifespan
Trophic Level
3.2
Depth
Climate
Tropical
Resilience
Medium
Vulnerability
39.00/100
Typical Length
Depth Zone

📖 Overview

Overview information for Labeobarbus Wittei is currently being compiled by our editorial team.

Scientific Name
Labeobarbus wittei
Authority
Banister & Poll, 1973
Habitat
Freshwater
Climate
Tropical
IUCN Status
DD
Max Length
27.5 cm
Trophic Level
3.2
Resilience
Medium
Vulnerability
39.00/100
Salinity
0–0.5 ppt

🔬 Taxonomy

🐟 Physical Description

Physical description for Labeobarbus Wittei is currently being compiled.

🌀 Behaviour

Behavioural data for Labeobarbus Wittei is currently being reviewed.

🦐 Diet

Diet information for Labeobarbus Wittei is currently being compiled.

🥚 Reproduction

Reproduction data for Labeobarbus Wittei is currently being compiled.

🌍 Habitat & Distribution

Freshwater; benthopelagic. Tropical

🌿 Ecology

Zone Preferences
💧 Freshwater
Trophic Level
3.2±0.5

📐 Morphometrics

Length–Weight Relationship: W = 0.00468 × L3.1 (TL)
Max TL
27.5cm

🌡️ Water Parameters & Tolerance

Salinity Range
0–0.5ppt

🛡️ Conservation Assessment

IUCN Category
Data Deficient
Assessment Date
2009

📊 Population Risk & Fisheries

Population Resilience
Medium
Minimum doubling time
Fishing Vulnerability
39.00/100
Moderate vulnerability
Trophic Level
3.2
Predator
Climate Zone
Tropical
Described By
Banister & Poll, 1973

👥 Community & Contribute

Aquareap Community Observations
0 Observations logged on Aquareap

No observations yet — be the first to log one!

View all observations for Labeobarbus Wittei ↗
Suggest an Edit

Spotted incorrect or outdated data? Submit a correction and our editorial team will review it. Approved edits go live within 48 hours.

Link to a scientific paper, FishBase, or other authoritative source
Report an Issue

Found a factual error, broken data, or inappropriate content? Let us know and we will investigate promptly.