New 🐟 Mercury Safety Guide & Omega-3 Rankings Updated for 2026. View Omega-3 Rankings →

💧 Freshwater 🌡️ Tropical

Pareiorhaphis Mucurina

Pareiorhaphis mucurina Pereira, Pessali & Reis, 2018
Max Length
9.7 cm
Max Weight
-
Lifespan
-
Trophic Level
-
Depth
0–2 m
Climate
Tropical
Resilience
High
Vulnerability
27.00/100
Typical Length
-
Depth Zone
-

📖 Overview

Facultative air-breathing in the genus ; Collected from a fast flowing, tea-colored water running on a bedrock bottom, and a fair amount of preserved marginal vegetation. Captured specimens in places 0.2-1.7 m deep and 3-16 m wide. Individuals are very abundant, and most were hand-caught among rocks and inside cracks and crevices of the bedrock. Associated species caught are Euryochus thysanos, Astyanax aff. fasciatus, and unidentified species of Characidium and Trichomycterus .

Scientific Name
Pareiorhaphis mucurina
Authority
Pereira, Pessali & Reis, 2018
Habitat
Freshwater
Climate
Tropical
Max Length
9.7 cm
Depth Range
0–2 m
Resilience
High
Vulnerability
27.00/100
Salinity
0–0.5 ppt

🐟 Physical Description

This species is distinguished from its congeners by the following characters: lower lip with a distinct narrow area completely lacking of papillae along and just posterior to each emergent tooth series of the dentary (vs. area posterior to tooth series of the dentary covered by papillae) and by having a short maxillary barbel, mostly adnate to lower lip by distinctly enlarged skin flap forming a continuous connection from the base to almost the end of the maxillary barbel (vs. small flap of skin connecting the maxillary barbel); further distinguished by the papillae in upper lip coalesced to form 3 or 4 transverse series of elongate skin folds anterior to the premaxillary tooth series (vs. papillae rounded, not fused to form skin folds); differs from all its congeners, except P. garapia, P. garbei, P. nasuta, P. proskynita, P. splendens, P. vestigipinnis, P. vetula by having a smaller eye diameter 8.5-11.3% (vs. 11.7-18.8% HL) and it differs from these seven species by having the soft fleshy lobe on the lateral margin of head progressively wider posteriorly in adult males (vs. soft fleshy lobe not widening posteriorly along the lateral margin of the head); differs from P. garapia, P. vestigipinnis, P. vetula by having a well-developed dorsal-fin spinelet (vs. dorsal-fin spinelet absent); differs from P. garbei by having bifid teeth, with a small lateral cusp in both the dentary and the premaxilla (vs. teeth simple, without lateral cusp in both dentary and premaxilla); differs from P. proskynita, P. vestigipinnis in having an adipose fin (vs. adipose fin absent); differs from P. splendens by the long first unbranched pelvic-fin ray, approximately equal in size or longer than the pectoral-fin spine (vs. first unbranched pelvic-fin ray short, always shorter than the pectoral-fin spine); differs from P. nasuta by having the lateral tooth cusp longer, almost reaching or reaching to middle of medial cusp (vs. lateral cusp minute, never reaching to middle of medial cusp) .Cross section: angular.

🌀 Behaviour

Behavioural data for Pareiorhaphis Mucurina is currently being reviewed.

🦐 Diet

Diet information for Pareiorhaphis Mucurina is currently being compiled.

🥚 Reproduction

Reproduction data for Pareiorhaphis Mucurina is currently being compiled.

🌍 Habitat & Distribution

Freshwater; benthopelagic; depth range 0 - 2 m . Tropical South America: Brazil.

🌿 Ecology

Zone Preferences
💧 Freshwater

📐 Morphometrics

Length–Weight Relationship: W = 0.00977 × L3.06 (TL)
Max TL
9.7cm

🌡️ Water Parameters & Tolerance

Salinity Range
0–0.5ppt

📊 Population Risk & Fisheries

Population Resilience
High
Minimum doubling time
Fishing Vulnerability
27.00/100
Low vulnerability
Climate Zone
Tropical
Described By
Pereira, Pessali & Reis, 2018

👥 Community & Contribute

Aquareap Community Observations
0 Observations logged on Aquareap

No observations yet - be the first to log one!

View all observations for Pareiorhaphis Mucurina ↗
Suggest an Edit

Spotted incorrect or outdated data? Submit a correction and our editorial team will review it. Approved edits go live within 48 hours.

Link to a scientific paper, FishBase, or other authoritative source
Report an Issue

Found a factual error, broken data, or inappropriate content? Let us know and we will investigate promptly.