Inhabits pools in clear, rocky streams often streams with emergent marginal vegetation . Spawning is likely to begin in summer, from October to November ; breeding pairs lay eggs in vegetation .
Dorsal spines (total): 0; Dorsal soft rays (total): 10; Anal spines: 0; Anal soft rays: 8. Diagnosis: Enteromius pallidus can be identified by the slightly convex dorsal surface; posterior barbel 2.0 to 3.0 times the length of anterior barbel; a slightly prominent snout; an incomplete lateral line; deep translucent light brown to golden sheen with the presence of irregular and scattered spots in mature adults; and the presence of 3-7 bold spots above the lateral line in juveniles and subadults . This species belongs to the group of Enteromius species in southern Africa that is characterised by a simple and flexible unbranched primary dorsal fin ray . It is distinguished from E. amatolicus, E. anoplus, E. annectens, E. toppini and E. radiatus by possession of two pairs of prominent and long barbels vs. single pair and/or minute oral barbels in other species; it is distinguished from E. lineomaculatus, E. viviparus and E. unitaeniatus by absence of distinct chevron markings on the lateral line vs. presence of conspicuous chevron markings on the lateral line in the other three species, and from E. bifrenatus by absence of a distinct lateral stripe and absence of black tubular markings around lateral line pores vs. presence in E. bifrenatus; it is distinguished from E. anoplus, E. amatolicus, E. annectens, E. unitaeniatus, E. bifrenatus, E. gurneyi, E. motebensis, E. radiatus, E. toppini, E. treurensis and E. viviparus by the presence of scattered black spots on the body, particularly in juveniles vs. absence of scattered black spots in the other species . Lateral pigmentation pattern of E. pallidus is closely similar to that of E. brevipinnis and E. neefi, but it is distinguished from these two species by having an incomplete lateral line vs. complete lateral line in both E. neefi and E. brevipinnis; it is further separated from E. neefi by absence of wavy lines along the scale rows vs. presence of conspicuous wavy lines along the scale rows in E. neefi, and from E. brevipinnis by lack of black pigmentation around the borders of the scales vs. presence of distinct black pigmentation around the scales in E. brevipinnis, giving a mesh-like pattern on the lateral side of the fish . : fusiform / normal; Cross section: compressed.
Behavioural data for Goldie barb is currently being reviewed.
Freshwater; benthopelagic. Subtropical; 24°S - 33°S South Africa, where it is distributed from the Krom to the Great Fish river system (Ref.
"Goldie barb is an edible species."
Detailed nutritional data for Goldie barb is currently being compiled from USDA FoodData Central.
Mercury data for Goldie barb has not yet been assigned. Please consult FDA/EPA guidance for general seafood safety advice.
Per 100g - Raw, per 100g - Source: USDA FoodData Central templates (generic fish average)
| Year | Region | Index | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - |
| Scientific Name | Author | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barbus hemipleurogramma | Boulenger | 1911 | Synonym |
| Barbus pallidus | Smith | 1841 | Synonym |
The following diseases are known to affect Goldie barb.
Occurrence records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) - 7 records indexed .
No observations yet - be the first to log one!
View all observations for Goldie barb ↗Spotted incorrect or outdated data? Submit a correction and our editorial team will review it. Approved edits go live within 48 hours.
Found a factual error, broken data, or inappropriate content? Let us know and we will investigate promptly.